With respect to your manuscript #1904 entitled, “Compared Quality of Life after different RT technologies,” which was submitted to Radiology and Oncology, and based on the comments listed below, it has not been accepted for publication.
Currently we can publish only part of submissions. Thus, many otherwise worthwhile papers are not accepted relative to their publication priority assigned by the reviewers and editors. We recognize the complexities involved in the preparation of a manuscript, and hope that this decision does not discourage you from future submissions to our journal.
Thank you for sending us your manuscript; we hope the comments listed below will be of value to you.
Comments:
The authors reported on QoL in 3 groups of patients treated with different RT techniques. Although the topic is highly relevant there are at least 2 important reasons why the manuscript does not meet the quality standards of the Radiol Oncol:
1. English MUST be improved considerably.
2. Manuscript must be prepared according to the “Guidelines for the Authors”, published at the web page of the Radiol Oncol (Abstract, reference style etc).
In case the authors will decide to strictly follow the above listed demands, they are advised to resubmit the manuscript as a new submission
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers. Five Filters recommends: 'You Say What You Like, Because They Like What You Say' - http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/alerts-2013/731-you-say-what-you-like-because-they-like-what-you-say.html
留言列表
留言列表
